<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Music Ahoy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://immortalsoon.co.uk/archive/467/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://immortalsoon.co.uk/archive/467</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Denyer</title>
		<link>http://immortalsoon.co.uk/archive/467/comment-page-1#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Denyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 16:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inaudible.co.uk/blog/archives/467#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Yeah, a bit of crowd and banter in the mix is nice. Often you can get preferable results with a mic in front of a band than by simply recording through the soundboard, because that's been optimised for a specific set of speakers...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plus it's always different listening to a gig that you were at.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, a bit of crowd and banter in the mix is nice. Often you can get preferable results with a mic in front of a band than by simply recording through the soundboard, because that&#8217;s been optimised for a specific set of speakers&#8230;</p>
<p>Plus it&#8217;s always different listening to a gig that you were at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://immortalsoon.co.uk/archive/467/comment-page-1#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 14:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inaudible.co.uk/blog/archives/467#comment-651</guid>
		<description>gimme raw stuff any day :0)&lt;br /&gt;
i actually like my own recordings of the cwps gig better than those, can't be anything to do with quality though, maybe just atmosphere or something...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gimme raw stuff any day :0)<br />
i actually like my own recordings of the cwps gig better than those, can&#8217;t be anything to do with quality though, maybe just atmosphere or something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denyer</title>
		<link>http://immortalsoon.co.uk/archive/467/comment-page-1#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Denyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 14:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inaudible.co.uk/blog/archives/467#comment-650</guid>
		<description>&gt; the actual song's much better than the one on white russain galaxy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, hell yeah. Extra bits, a lot more &#34;oomph&#34; to the playing. The original is sounding quite slow and empty now in comparison. =)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's two schools of thought when it comes to releasing live stuff. The purist approach involves giving people the raw recording to play with, the other giving things some  post-prod for people who normally only listen to studio work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as the d/l quality goes, I can only guess that KAH supplied TT with 160kbps encodings. It could've been done less sloppily for no extra effort, y'know?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> the actual song&#8217;s much better than the one on white russain galaxy</p>
<p>Oh, hell yeah. Extra bits, a lot more &quot;oomph&quot; to the playing. The original is sounding quite slow and empty now in comparison. =)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s two schools of thought when it comes to releasing live stuff. The purist approach involves giving people the raw recording to play with, the other giving things some  post-prod for people who normally only listen to studio work.</p>
<p>As far as the d/l quality goes, I can only guess that KAH supplied TT with 160kbps encodings. It could&#8217;ve been done less sloppily for no extra effort, y&#8217;know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://immortalsoon.co.uk/archive/467/comment-page-1#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 08:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inaudible.co.uk/blog/archives/467#comment-649</guid>
		<description>and incase anyone just reads the first sentance of that, he means the audio quality. the actual songs much better than the one on white russain galaxy, believe me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and that eq setting you showed me ages ago works alright with it...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.denyersarea.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/sickle.gif&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
could be better but that's what albums are for.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and incase anyone just reads the first sentance of that, he means the audio quality. the actual songs much better than the one on white russain galaxy, believe me.</p>
<p>and that eq setting you showed me ages ago works alright with it&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.denyersarea.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/sickle.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.denyersarea.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/sickle.gif</a></p>
<p>could be better but that&#8217;s what albums are for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denyer</title>
		<link>http://immortalsoon.co.uk/archive/467/comment-page-1#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Denyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 21:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inaudible.co.uk/blog/archives/467#comment-648</guid>
		<description>I got 'Girl Just Died' to see if it was better than the 30-second previews. Nope. They're lying when they say &#34;We supply music files at a bitrate of at least 192kbps.&#34;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can hear the new structure and arrangement, but other than that the recording is very muffled apart from vocals/keyboards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either turn it up lots, or people might like to check this out:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://winamp.com/plugins/details.php?id=3973&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...and try things with the first knob a bit towards mono, the second one round to 'life' and a bit more volume (gain). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, sounds like it was a great gig even if the recording's iffy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got &#8216;Girl Just Died&#8217; to see if it was better than the 30-second previews. Nope. They&#8217;re lying when they say &quot;We supply music files at a bitrate of at least 192kbps.&quot;</p>
<p>You can hear the new structure and arrangement, but other than that the recording is very muffled apart from vocals/keyboards.</p>
<p>Either turn it up lots, or people might like to check this out:</p>
<p><a href="http://winamp.com/plugins/details.php?id=3973" rel="nofollow">http://winamp.com/plugins/details.php?id=3973</a></p>
<p>&#8230;and try things with the first knob a bit towards mono, the second one round to &#8216;life&#8217; and a bit more volume (gain). </p>
<p>Still, sounds like it was a great gig even if the recording&#8217;s iffy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

